There was rampant misunderstanding about the rules and accounting that could govern postal banking. Opponents declare that brand new economic solutions would economically tank USPS and afterwards produce an unsustainable financial burden for the government that is federal.
However these issues donвЂ™t mount up. To start with, the postoffice just isn’t straight funded by taxation profits. The Postal Reorganization Act of 1970 has lawfully forced USPS to be self-sufficient, to build its income from the very own solutions, whatever draconian cuts Congress has since imposed. Additionally, the analysis by the Inspector General shows USPS it self probably will make money away from brand brand new services that are financial modest charges and interest.
If preventing Main Street from dropping in to the flames along side Wall Street should indeed be a nationwide concern, then a reliable postal bank operating system might be our most readily useful protection.
However, whatever the post officeвЂ™s own financial predicament, the federal governmentвЂ™s balance sheet will not consist of USPS assets and liabilities. Indeed, the separation is indeed complete that thereвЂ™s a law that is uniquely foolish USPS put aside money today for many future retiree wellness benefitsвЂ”without subsidy through the Treasury. This unique burden, which will be maybe not imposed upon just about any government enterprise, could be the primary reason for USPSвЂ™ economic woes.
Even in the event USPS funds had been within the wider federal budgetвЂ”as they perhaps should beвЂ”Deficit Hawk policies such as the pre-funding requirement will make also less sense. As Deficit Owls, like former Deputy Treasury Secretary Frank Newman, assert, asking an agency that is federal funded by the U.S. federal government to save lots of for the far remote future, is similar to forcing us to put on sweaters in July therefore we can keep heat for January.بیشتر بخوانید